Journal info (provided by editor)

Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
Immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
3.2 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
4.3 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Overall rating manuscript handling
3.3 / 5.0

Characteristics of peer review process

Average number of review rounds
2.6 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
3.0 / 5.0 (moderate)
Average number of review reports
2.7 reports
Quality of review reports
4.2 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 4.3 weeks. Overall rating: 5 (excellent). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
I had an excellent experience with this journal throughout the entire submission and review process. The editor handled my manuscript professionally, communicated clearly, and managed the process efficiently. The reviewers provided constructive, thoughtful, and detailed comments that significantly improved the quality, clarity, and overall strength of the paper. The review process was fair, rigorous, and supportive, making it a valuable experience as an author. I highly appreciate the professionalism of both the editorial team and the reviewers, and I would be pleased to submit my future work to this journal.