SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 3 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 3.2 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 3.2 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 3.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 4.3 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments n/a compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 4.7 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 9.9 weeks. Overall rating: 4 (very good). Outcome: Drawn back.

All three reviews were positive and constructive. In an ideal world, I would have revised the paper, but it overlapped with my very busy time. The editorial office was firm with the deadline, so I decided to take the comments that were easily addressable, and submit the paper to a different journal.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Lingua has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor
Disciplines: Linguistics

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.