Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Latest review

First review round: 8.7 weeks. Overall rating: 4 (very good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
Overall, I was very satisfied with how my manuscript was handled. The editorial team was professional, and the communication was clear throughout the process. The feedback from reviewers was constructive and helped improve the quality of the paper. My only points of note are that the process took longer than I had expected, and having seven reviewers was more than necessary in my view. Despite these minor issues, I felt the process was thorough and fair, and I appreciated the care taken at each stage.
4.5
Excellent process
Space for journal cover image

Disciplines