Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
1.4 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
1.9 months
Decision time immediate rejection
9 days
Average number of review rounds
1.6 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
2.6 / 5.0 (moderate)
Average number of review reports
2.1 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
2.6 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
2.9 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 4.0 weeks. Overall rating: 2 (moderate). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
The reviewers failed to recognize that we submitted a communication and expressed dissatisfaction with the limited inclusion of just two figures. Their feedback included a mix of inaccuracies and irrelevant suggestions, such as altering bond lengths and the molecule's name. In the end, only a few questions from one of the reviewers proved genuinely constructive. The second reviewer provided an extensive 28 comments, with roughly 20 of them being redundant and unhelpful.