Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
3.2 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
3.3 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
2.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
1.0 / 5.0 (very easy)
Average number of review reports
3.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
5.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
4.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 14.0 weeks. Overall rating: 4 (very good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
At the time we sent the article, the journal was in the process of being transferred to another publisher, so we could not access their system to track the submission until the mail with the reviewers' comments arrived. Of the 3 reviewers, 2 did not make many comments. But overall, they were helpful in improving the final version of the article. One negative point was their delay in the editing and layout stage, although in the end they also managed to publish the article in the number they indicated after accepting the final version.