Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
2.3 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
2.3 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
1.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
n/a
Average number of review reports
2.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
2.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
2.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 10.0 weeks. Overall rating: 2 (moderate). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
I was disappointed that both the editor and one of the reviewers failed to understand a key concept addressed in the paper. Consequently their comments largely missed the point. I suspect the editor (who is an expert in this field) took the reviewer comments at face value rather than reading the paper closely himself. But at least the process did not take too long!