Latest review
First review round: 9.1 weeks. Overall rating: 5 (excellent).
Outcome: Accepted.
Motivation:
I am very satisfied with how the journal handled the review process. The handling editor was very active in seeking out reviewers. The comments made by the two reviewers were constructive, and lead to improvements to the submitted software and the corresponding documentation. I should also add that I am a fan of the open peer review model employed by this journal.