Latest review
First review round: 17.6 weeks. Overall rating: 4 (very good).
Outcome: Accepted.
Motivation:
The communication with the journal was good. The editorial assistent took care that the manuscript, references, figures and so on were made perfect in the administrative phase. There was only one reviewer, but the critical and constructive comments were of good quality and helped to improve the manuscript. There was a delay before we resubmitted the article, but this was due to personal circumstances of the first author.
