Journal info (provided by editor)

Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
Immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
0.2 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
0.2 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Overall rating manuscript handling
0.0 / 5.0

Characteristics of peer review process

Average number of review rounds
1.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
n/a
Average number of review reports
1.0 reports
Quality of review reports
0.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 1.0 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
EIC requested manuscript be reduced to a Technical Note for expedited Review. After reformulation, the submitted Technical Note was reviewed by a single assistant Editor who confessed ignorance of the content, yet issued a verdict to "reject without resubmit". EIC and assistants need to communicate and stop wasting authors' time. Claimed journal rejection rates should be judged with skepticism.