Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Latest review

First review round: 18.3 weeks. Overall rating: 2 (moderate). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
The final decision on the article took too long for a prestigious journal. The editors did not provide an outcome until I personally inquired about the status of the manuscript. One of the reviewers showed a clesr disciplinary bias and included some theoretical criticisms that were not entirely accurate. The editor’s contribution was minimal.
3.8
Very good process
Space for journal cover image

Disciplines