Review this journal

Journal of Development Studies

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 2 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 4.4 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 4.4 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 2.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments n/a compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 0.5 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 22.3 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Beware of this journal. After waiting for a long time to get our manuscript reviewed, the editor decided to reject our manuscript because of the large number of submissions the journal receives and the size of the tasks that the suggested revisions would entail. Both reviewers were fairly positive about our manuscript, but raised a few concerns. Non of the concerns were really fundamental or insurmountable. What happened to major revision? After such a long waiting time to get referee reports, the least we deserve is a decent chance to defend our hard work and revise the paper, no?

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor
Disciplines: Economics, Development

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.