Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
7.6 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
7.6 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
1.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
n/a
Average number of review reports
2.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
1.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
0.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 33.0 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
The revision process took approximately 8 months, at the end of which my manuscript was rejected by the editor in chief, telling me that the reviewers suggested for its rejection. However, in the comments attached, both reviewers did not mentioned any suggestions about the acceptance or rejection of the article. However, the main point that gave us a bad experience was the fact that every time we wrote to the editorial board asking for an update, they was always a specific problem that was almost being solved, and that would require two additional weeks at most. This same response was given to us for several months.