Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
1.9 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
4.9 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
2.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
4.0 / 5.0 (difficult)
Average number of review reports
2.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
3.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
2.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 8.7 weeks. Overall rating: 1 (bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
4 reviewers in total ready our manuscript. They were very dogmatic in their approach to analytical chemistry which led them to reject our manuscript three times. Tired of appealing to an inexperienced editor we decided to send our manuscript to a high impact science journal. After 6.4 weeks our manuscript was accepted, following reports of 5 reviewers none of which questioning our methods!
2.0
Moderate process
2 reviews
Space for journal cover image

Disciplines

Archaeology

Related journals

Boreas Revue Biblique Cambridge Archaeological Journal