Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
1.9 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
8.1 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
8.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
4.0 / 5.0 (difficult)
Average number of review reports
2.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
2.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
2.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 8.3 weeks. Overall rating: 2 (moderate). Outcome: Drawn back.

Motivation:
We sympathise with the editors I am sure it was difficult changing a reviewer after 2 rounds of review. However after 2 rounds the reviews were 1 accept and 1 very minor before he/she pulled out. The two additional rounds of reviews from the new reviewer asked for the paper to revert to original format, undoing a great deal of effort from all concerned. Editor has refused to publish without addressing all the new reviewers comments which goes against the other reviewer (who had accepted). I suggest you publish anywhere else.