Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
n/a
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
n/a
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
n/a
Difficulty of reviewer comments
n/a
Average number of review reports
n/a

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
n/a
Overall rating manuscript handling
4.0 / 5.0

Latest review

Overall rating: 4 (very good). Outcome: Accepted (im.).

Motivation:
The journal demonstrates a well-organized and professional peer-review process. The editorial team handles submissions efficiently, and communication with authors is clear and timely. The review process is fair, constructive, and helps improve the quality of the manuscript. Overall, the journal maintains good academic standards and provides a positive experience for authors. Minor improvements in review time consistency could further enhance the process.