Journal info (provided by editor)

Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
Immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
n/a
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
n/a
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Overall rating manuscript handling
4.0 / 5.0

Characteristics of peer review process

Average number of review rounds
n/a
Difficulty of reviewer comments
n/a
Average number of review reports
n/a
Quality of review reports
n/a

Latest review

Overall rating: 4 (very good). Outcome: Accepted (im.).

Motivation:
The journal demonstrates a well-organized and professional peer-review process. The editorial team handles submissions efficiently, and communication with authors is clear and timely. The review process is fair, constructive, and helps improve the quality of the manuscript. Overall, the journal maintains good academic standards and provides a positive experience for authors. Minor improvements in review time consistency could further enhance the process.