Rejected after 26 days. To be honest, when I saw on scirev that a senior had written about being rejected at the table for 25 days but had survived for 25 days and even celebrated a little, I never expected the retribution to come so soon (laugh). The advantage of the internal audit is that they did review the papers and put forward two relatively precise opinions. The drawback is that the efficiency is indeed not commendable. Four days after submission, "with editor+UR". Twenty days after submission, "with editor" disappears, leaving only "UR". Personally, I guess only the UR after we disappeared was truly under review by the editorial department. But from this perspective, the efficiency was quite low. Basically, there was no progress for about twenty full days.
