Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Latest review

First review round: 8.9 weeks. Overall rating: 4 (very good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
Journal is a good choice for papers around "sustainability in higher education" that are not good fits for other journals. Ours was a case study, and Journal was perfect for the interdisciplinary topic. Positives: Peer reviewers were reasonable and seemed knowledgeable about the topic. Editors were fair and helpful throughout process. Journal has genuine peer review which is constructive. Publication policies (e.g., self archiving) are well done and ethical. Journal has reasonable expectations for novelty/impact; review is more about quality of the work. Negatives: Inconsistent policies, especially with the web upload process vs. reviewer/editor comments. Some of editor response times were rather slow. Reviewer comments did not harm the manuscript but I don't think they improved it much either. Review comments were mostly about stuff like "add a literature review" and "add a conclusions section", which is more stylistic in my view.