Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
2.1 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
3.4 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
2.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
1.0 / 5.0 (very easy)
Average number of review reports
2.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
4.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
3.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 9.0 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
With credit to the editor, they tried tirelessly to contact and obtain reviewers, although all of which were solely suggested by the authors. It took in excess of 22 suggested reviewers before the final set of suggested reviewers had successfully volunteered. This seeming reluctance to review could be attributed in part to the unblinded review process.