Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
5.8 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
14.5 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
2.3 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
3.7 / 5.0 (difficult)
Average number of review reports
1.7 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
2.3 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
0.3 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 33.1 weeks. Overall rating: 1 (bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
The editor hand picked a very negative reviewer for round 2, who came up with a lot of non-substantive feedback. Some critique went against things we had implemented after the first review round. In the end, in round three new critique was raised that went against fundamental questions of the data collection. To identify these should be the editors or the first round reviewers task, not a third round review. In part condescending tone in both the reviews and the editorial communication.