Journal info (provided by editor)

Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
Immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
2.7 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
2.7 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Overall rating manuscript handling
3.0 / 5.0

Characteristics of peer review process

Average number of review rounds
1.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
n/a
Average number of review reports
1.0 reports
Quality of review reports
1.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 11.7 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
I was happy with the editorial process, but the comments I received from the reviewer were unfortunately not useful. The criticism stayed at a general level and included very little constructive feedback. For example, the reviewer indicated that there were too few references, "not all reviews on the subject are referred to", but gave no specific information on these missing pieces.