Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Latest review

First review round: 22.7 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
I submitted in July. After months of being "under review", and no response to any emails, we received rejection on new year's eve. From a different editor. Who couldn't spell the name of their own journal. Who quoted our own conclusions as a reason for rejection. In an email with more spelling and grammar mistakes than there were lines in the email. Finally, the rejection was stated as being due to the paper being unsuited for being sent to review. After 5 months under review! We received no reply, or reviewer's reports, despite contacting the journal for an appeal.
1.5
Moderate process
Space for journal cover image