Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Higher Education Policy has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor
Disciplines: Education

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 5 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases
Duration first review round 2.0 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 2.1 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection 2 days compare →
Characteristics of peer review process
Average number of review reports 1.8 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.5 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.5 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 5.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 3.5 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review

Outcome: Rejected (im.).

The editor read rather carefully the manuscript and made several positive comments about it. Several, sound, reasons were given for the desk-reject, mainly linked to methodological concerns and some doubts regarding the innovative character of the findings. It is not common for editors to give that much attention to a paper that does not proceed to peer-review, so we are very grateful to the editor for his detailed and constructive feedback. Also, the very fast rejection (within 2 days) was much appreciated, since it allowed us to ressubmit the paper to a more suitable journal.