SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 6 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 7.6 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 8.3 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection 9 days compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 1.5 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.3 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 2.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 2.3 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 63.0 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
Our manuscript was submitted in 2016, but we did not receive any review until 2018. Every 3-4 months we wrote emails, but the manager claimed he could not recruit reviewers. We ourselves provided 10 reviewer candidacies. In 2018 we received one review, which claimed that our manuscript "was very interesting. The content within the paper was well developed and the research was completed thoroughly. From a technical aspect, the paper was done well. However, the paper faced many grammatical errors including the misuse of commas". In the same email our manuscript was rejected without giving us a chance to correct the grammar. We tried to appeal to the Principal Editor, but received just a formal reply. Next month we submitted our manuscript to Fuel Processing Technology. It was reviewed and published in less than 2 months

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Fuel has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.