Journal info (provided by editor)

Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
Immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
2.9 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
3.9 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Overall rating manuscript handling
3.0 / 5.0

Characteristics of peer review process

Average number of review rounds
2.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
2.0 / 5.0 (easy)
Average number of review reports
2.0 reports
Quality of review reports
3.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 12.7 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
The review process took a long time considering the short and fairly easy going reviews I received. It also took longer than I'd have expected to get an editor's decision (especially since I submitted to a special issue). Overall the process was ok and the interactive review system made it fairly quick to make and get revisions approved. Very high APC, as we're used to with Frontiers.