Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
1.3 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
2.1 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
2.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
3.0 / 5.0 (moderate)
Average number of review reports
2.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
3.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
4.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 5.7 weeks. Overall rating: 4 (very good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
Although our paper was accepted and my view might be somewhat biased, I must say that the process was incredibly smooth relative to what I had heard about the persnicketiness of APA journals (I guess we were extra careful to dot all the i's.....). If nothing else, the process of review was **fast**! Much faster than recent experiences with paid-for open-access journals. So overall, very happy with the review process etc.