Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Latest review

First review round: 20.1 weeks. Overall rating: 4 (very good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
In the beginning, the paper took more than 6 weeks to be assigned to the editor. We emailed the editorial assistant and he was extremely helpful and attentive. Throughout the submission process, we emailed the editorial assistant several times with different inquiries about the paper and he was always fast in replying and helpful. In our view, the quality of the reviewer reports was not the best. However, their suggestions were quite clear and straightforward. Overall, they were able to understand the main argument of the paper which is not always guaranteed with peer-reviewers. All in all we are quite satisfied with the way in which our manuscript was handled by the EERJ.
4.5
Excellent process
Space for journal cover image