Journal info (provided by editor)

Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
Immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Latest review

First review round: 10.0 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
The review process itself was fast and efficient. A reviewer was secured quickly and provided helpful feedback. However, the editorial support and technical infrastructure were very disappointing. A technical glitch during the LaTeX file upload caused massive system errors, and due to generic and unhelpful support responses, the resubmission was delayed for several weeks. While the academic side was smooth, the technical handling needs major improvement.
2.7
Good process
Space for journal cover image