Europe-Asia Studies

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Europe-Asia Studies has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 5 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases
Duration first review round 8.5 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 8.5 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process
Average number of review reports 2.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 1.3 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments n/a compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 0.8 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review

First review round: 33.9 weeks. Overall rating: 1 (bad). Outcome: Rejected.

A very long review process. I received a very strange report that contained an "amalgamation" of two reviews, as it was explained by the editor. It was impossible to judge whether one, two or three persons wrote the review report. The review report itself was very angry and provided no help. Non-transparent reviewing. I will not submit a new paper until the current editorial team will be changed by new editors.