SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 1 review)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 2.0 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 2.0 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 3.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 0.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments n/a compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 0.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 8.7 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
The reviewers appeared to be in a hurry, looking for any excuse to reject. The reasons they gave were imaginary, things that existed only in the reveiwer's minds. The words they used did not match the contents of the paper. This is irresponsible behavior. The publishing of papers is the primary criteria for being hired into research positions. These reviewers have tremendous power over the lives of authors. There needs to be a feedback mechanism in place that corrects their behavior when they act irresponsibly like this.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Europar has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a
Disciplines: Computer science

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.