Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
n/a
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
n/a
Decision time immediate rejection
17 days
Average number of review rounds
n/a
Difficulty of reviewer comments
n/a
Average number of review reports
n/a

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
n/a
Overall rating manuscript handling
n/a

Latest review

Outcome: Rejected (im.).

Motivation:
The process was very opaque. Two weeks after submitting we got notice that it had passed initial screening and that it was waiting for reviewer selection. Then, a week before receiving the rejection letter, we got an email indicating that "all required reviews" had been received. Then we got the decision letter saying that the editor did not send the paper to reviewers and decided to reject the paper.