SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 1 review)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 0.9 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 3.4 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 4.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 3.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 5.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 3.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 5.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 4.0 weeks. Overall rating: 5 (excellent). Outcome: Accepted.

The manuscript was accepted after discussing with the editor regarding the final reviewer request and why we could not address this. This is an excellent journal with excellent editors who actively review the reviewers opinions and weigh them against that of authors and content of the manuscript before a final decision is made. A very sound (and fast) review process that is fair and rigorous and would recommend this as the endocrine journal of choice to researchers.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Endocrine has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor
Disciplines: Endocrinology

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.