Latest review
First review round: 15.7 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad).
Outcome: Rejected.
Motivation:
At least one of the reviewers does not seem to have read the article (s/he suggested that the article criticized an author that was in fact used as support; s/he suggested irrelevant references, probably his/hers). The second report was not much better. The poor quality of reports is probably related to the fact that after more than 3months, I asked the editor if the decision was coming.
