Criminal Justice Studies

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Criminal Justice Studies has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor
Disciplines: Social sciences, Sociology

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 1 review)

Duration of manuscript handling phases
Duration first review round 1.9 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 1.9 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process
Average number of review reports 5.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 2.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments n/a compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 0.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review

First review round: 8.3 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Four reviewers provided useful information, but one was quite abusive. The editor separately sent the additional negative review, which appeared to have access to personally identifiable information about one of the authors. This review also provided absolutely no content-based comments. When the senior author addressed this with the editor, the response was that they were under an ethical obligation to forward all reviews even if they were derogatory and personally attacked an author. We disagree with this statement, are concerned about the blinding procedures, and believe that this journal perpetuates a negative academic environment.