Review this journal

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 1 review)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 4.7 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 6.7 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 3.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 2.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 20.4 weeks. Overall rating: 2 (moderate). Outcome: Rejected.

The review process was very slow, particularly for a journal that advertises a "fast publication schedule". I had to contact the editorial office on multiple occasions and was asked to provide additional suggestions for potential reviewers. Furthermore, it is clear that acceptance was very unlikely from the outset, as the editor ultimately rejected the basis of the study.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor
Disciplines: Health policy

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.