Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
1.2 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
3.4 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
2.5 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
4.0 / 5.0 (difficult)
Average number of review reports
1.5 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
3.5 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
2.5 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 6.0 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
A statistical review was only introduced in the 4th review round. The editor agreed with the statistical reviewer's comments and rejected the manuscript around 9 months after our submission. I believe the 4th review round was too late to add a statistical review, and at the very last, the editor should have given us an opportunity to revise and respond to the reviewer's comments.