My manuscript remained “With Editor” for about 77 days before a desk rejection was issued.
The decision letter mentioned a technical problem that delayed the editorial process, but no specific scientific reason for rejection was provided.
Although the editors apologized, this long waiting time without external review is disappointing, especially compared to the journal’s stated average of 17 days to first decision.
Clearer communication and a more efficient handling of submissions would greatly improve the author experience.
Additionally, the Editorial Manager system does not allow authors to contact the handling editor directly.
All correspondence must go through Elsevier’s central support form, which further delays communication and leaves authors uncertain about the real status of their submission.
For young researchers and students involved in the publication process, this lack of transparency and responsiveness can be very discouraging.
