Review this journal

Cell Reports

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 2 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 0.8 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 1.1 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.5 compare →
Quality of review reports 2.5 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 4.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 2.5 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 4.0 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Paper was transferred from Neuron based on fake critics. Reviewer made false presentation of the manuscript content and constructed on those fakes a fake criticism. Editor at Cell Reports send again to same reviewer even so my detailed response to the invalid arguments should have been obvious. Reviewer took this opportunity to again abuse his anonymity and produced fake more news. Most unpleasant experience of a mail-robotic editor.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Cell Reports has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor
Disciplines: Medical genetics

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.