Review this journal

Cell Reports

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 1 review)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 0.6 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 0.9 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 5.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 4.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 5.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 2.6 weeks. Overall rating: 5 (excellent). Outcome: Accepted.

The handling editor was extremely fast. The reviewers were very knowledgeable of the topic, and although the experiments for the revision were very demanding, they accepted that we could only do some of them, and accepted the paper after the first revision. In addition, the status of the paper was very clear on the editorial manager, such that we knew one day before the official e-mail from the journal that the paper was being sent out for review. Moreover, the proofs were fast and looked amazing. It was overall a very good experience.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Cell Reports has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor
Disciplines: Medical genetics

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.