Review this journal

BMC Public Health

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 8 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 2.7 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 5.2 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection 5 days compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.3 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 3.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 2.6 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 15.4 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Drawn back.

The quality of the review process was very, very low. Our manuscript was a follow-up of a study already published 3 times in high-level journals, and used the same exact methodology. The Editor and a reviewer asked us to entirely change the methodology, suggesting revisions that were clearly, plain wrong. On some points, the review was hironic, as they told us to change parts of the methods, when such methods were published 3 years before in the same journal. One of the worst revisions I have ever had (among more than 200): we had to withdraw the manuscript, which has been accepted - after few, minor revisions - on a higher I.F. journal.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of BMC Public Health has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor
Disciplines: Public health

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.