Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Latest review

First review round: 38.6 weeks. Overall rating: 1 (bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
The entire process for my manuscript took a total of 11 months. The initial assignment of an editor took approximately 2.5 months, and the manuscript was then sent out for review within a day. However, it took about 5.5 months to find reviewers. The revision decision, along with reviewer comments, was shared after 1.5 months. The revised manuscript was re-evaluated within 15 days, and the editor provided the final rejection decision after an additional 5 weeks. Additionally, I found the tone of one of the reviewers to be somewhat discouraging and less constructive than expected. For instance, their final comment on the revised manuscript was: "The authors rejected all my substantive comments. I have no additional comments on the few modifications they made in their responses."
2.3
Moderate process
Space for journal cover image

Disciplines