Review this journal

Biotropica

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 1 review)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 2.0 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 2.3 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 5.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 2.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 5.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 8.6 weeks. Overall rating: 5 (excellent). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
The process from this journal is exactly like a journal should operate. My paper was given two reviews and the reviewers got enough time to give me excellent reviews. They were long, but thorough, and significantly improved the writing of the manuscript. It was clear that the paper was considered thoughtfully. The subject editor also gave great advice and helped with content as well as minor editing details to fit the style of the journal. The first decision was 'minor revisions'. Given the requested revisions were mainly in the writing and clarity of methods, I would agree with that outcome. They also gave plenty of time to make the revisions, and the final acceptance was quick. I had a great experience at this journal and will definitely submit there agian

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Biotropica has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a
Disciplines: Ecology

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.