Review this journal

Biology Letters

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 4 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 1.4 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 2.6 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.3 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.8 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 4.7 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 3.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 11.4 weeks. Overall rating: 1 (bad). Outcome: Rejected.

The duration was really long and one of the two reviews was batched (the other review was correct). I would like to say that I have no problem with being rejected (rejection is the rule in Academia), but I want to denounce the low quality of this journal (or for being fair, my bad experience with this journal.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Biology Letters has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor
Disciplines: Biology

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.