Journal info (provided by editor)

Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
Immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
1.5 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
1.5 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Overall rating manuscript handling
0.0 / 5.0

Characteristics of peer review process

Average number of review rounds
1.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
n/a
Average number of review reports
1.0 reports
Quality of review reports
0.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 6.6 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
One reviewer report; no other reviewers found by the journal. The one reviewer's comments were five sentences. The first three sentences indicate that the reviewer did not read the manuscript. The methods that are "not described" are in fact described, some of them in the supplementary material. The last sentence then states that this information that was "not described" should be in the main manuscript instead of the supplementary material. Based on this, the editor rejected the paper.