Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Latest review

First review round: 14.9 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
The sole reviewer constantly appealed that I was only quoting hearsay in the finding section, although I had quoted statistics and parliamentarian voices for triangulation purposes. My manuscript involved discussing the situation of three countries, but he was only attacking the finding sub-section related to a specific country. In any other parts of the manuscript, he made no comments. I am wondering if his nationality or background would make him reject any critics or unfavorable comments about the government of the country which my manuscript highlight some critics to them. Potentially, there are in fact conflict of interest. I complained to the EIC. This is entirely unfair. But they are unwilling to handle the situation.
0.0
Very bad process
Space for journal cover image

Disciplines