Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Latest review

First review round: 13.0 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
The reviewer did not consider the technical novelty proposed in the manuscript. Most of the criticisms on the proof reading are not correct and are due to lack of the reviewer attention. Other typos or reference error are due to the conversion of the word file into pdf. In summary, there are very few formal errors that are usually corrected during the review process but cannot be causes of rejection.
2.5
Good process
Space for journal cover image