Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
6.8 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
6.8 months
Decision time immediate rejection
11 days
Average number of review rounds
1.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
n/a
Average number of review reports
3.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
3.3 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
3.2 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 19.6 weeks. Overall rating: 4 (very good). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
We got three reviews who engaged with the manuscript. Two liked it in principle but suggested clarifications. One reads like (even on re-reading) that they are determined to destroy the paper. It's baffling because the reviewer flags several things where they are actually wrong. Given this very negative review, the editor had no choice and had to reject the paper. Could have been a bit faster overall.