Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
16.0 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
16.5 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
2.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
3.0 / 5.0 (moderate)
Average number of review reports
3.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
4.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
1.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 69.3 weeks. Overall rating: 1 (bad). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
The review process took unacceptably long (and did not even start in the first 6 months) and it occurred only by very extensive help from the author team (suggesting an unusually large number of potential peer reviewers). The remaining aspects of the review process were quite reasonable.