Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
8.3 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
13.1 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
2.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
4.0 / 5.0 (difficult)
Average number of review reports
1.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
4.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
4.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 35.9 weeks. Overall rating: 4 (very good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
The reviewer and editor in chief tried there best to improve the paper. However, I found the review process really slow. We had to send emails to get R&R and acceptance decisions, considering that my co-author know well the editor in chief. Some young authors would never try to send mails and abandon the project or research...