Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
3.0 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
3.0 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
1.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
n/a
Average number of review reports
2.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
1.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
0.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 13.0 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
The review process was unfair. I pointed out that one reviewer was wrong concerning an alleged error. The associate editor refused to forward this clarification to the said reviewer. Moreover, he refused to answer some questions regarding arguments for rejection or revision. Instead, he suggested resubmission of a newe article after revision. But: What should be revised? I was not amused.
0.0
Very bad process
1 review
Space for journal cover image

Disciplines

Physics

Related journals

Laser Physics Letters Reviews of Modern Physics Progress in Quantum Electronics