Latest review
First review round: 9.6 weeks. Overall rating: 5 (excellent).
Outcome: Accepted.
Motivation:
The journal demonstrated a high level of professionalism throughout the review and publication process.
The reviewers' comments were constructive and relevant, contributing to improving the quality of the manuscript.
The editors were responsive, collaborative, and provided clear and timely guidance at every stage.
Additionally, the copy editors were highly skilled and approachable, offering valuable support and ensuring the manuscript was polished to the highest standard.
Overall, it was a very positive and smooth experience, and I highly recommend this young journal that deserves to grow.
