Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
5.7 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
9.5 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
1.6 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
3.0 / 5.0 (moderate)
Average number of review reports
1.9 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
3.1 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
2.7 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 19.4 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
It takes 6 months to get the 1st review comments. Two reviewers' comments are of high quality but polarized, one suggesting minor revision and find it very interesting, while the other points out a few critics on the theory and methods, which can all be easily solved by revision. Unfortunately, the editors did not grant a revising or an opportunity for explanation. It takes quite long and should have already been in R&R if in other journals.