Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
3.0 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
4.5 months
Decision time immediate rejection
13 days
Average number of review rounds
1.9 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
3.9 / 5.0 (difficult)
Average number of review reports
2.7 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
3.4 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
2.9 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 14.9 weeks. Overall rating: 1 (bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
The review process is quite slow. The editor said that the reason why it took so long was waiting for the third reviewer, but there were only two in the end, one of whom has a very positive opinion, but the other has a completely opposite opinion. The main criticism is that the manuscript lacks details, although the journal has strict restrictions on the number of words and figures.