Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
0.6 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
0.9 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
2.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
2.0 / 5.0 (easy)
Average number of review reports
1.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
5.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
5.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 2.4 weeks. Overall rating: 5 (excellent). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
The review process is extremly fast. Everything is managed via email instead of a publication system, which I found very comfortable. Very nice is also that the corresponding author gets via email notice when the reviewers are informed about the paper.
5.0
Excellent process
1 review
Space for journal cover image

Disciplines

Neuroscience Otolaryngology

Related journals

Neuron Nature Reviews: Neuroscience Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience